Quote:
|
answer how the buildings collapsed with such precision without being packed with explosives.... and also explain why fire fighters and demolishions experts said "it was as if somebody was sat pressing button after button to blow out the floors accordingly".
|
Yeah, because, a building with an over two story debris pile that damages many of the buildings around it is a very precise pile. Yeah, and perhaps you've never heard of what a similie is? Show me where any demolitions expert would claim that. Sources, please.
Quote:
|
also explain why the government and "witnesses" said the plane hit the ground and slid across the pentagon lawn(GRASS) before hitting the building... yet in ALL the pictures the lawn was in perfect condition.
|
Yeah, I bet the lawn is in perfect condition. Explain where you got this information from. Oh wait, the smoke-filled picture on Loose Change, right? So you're telling me the government made another obvious error after punching themselves in the nose and running home to their mommy to blame the school bully?
Quote:
|
explain why this so called COMMERCIAL PLANE(passanger plane), had NO WINDOWS.. nore did it have COMMERCIAL MARKINGS...that basically takes the idea of it being commercial away.
|
You'll find several different accounts of the story...and you may notice that Loose Change doesn't even claim the voices of those witnesses are actually related to the towers, they could just be rambling. Explain to me why they WOULDN'T use a commercial airplane and say that it was. It'd make more sense to, I don't know, hijack the real plane instead.
Quote:
|
also explain how the pittsburgh crash site had no wreckage and no bodies. and also why all emergency services exact words were "this looked nothing like a crash site... there was no wreckage nore bodies".
|
There is a lot of wreckage and bodies. Loose Change contradicts itself: at one part, a "witness" claims from their ANGLE they didn't see anything but a hole and broken trees. Then he proceeded to say something along the lines of 'the people said that it looked like metal scraps had been dumped into a hole'. Yeah, it's kinda called...a similie. Also explain to me why the US would make this huge error. You ever realize that, I don't know, Loose Change never actually talks to a structural engineer or anything?
Quote:
|
explain why all cctv footage from surrounding buildings was confiscated by the FBI and only 5 frames from a pentagon cctv camera were ever released, and even in that footage you can clearly see its not a plane.
|
1. What makes you think 5 frames can comprehend a 500 mph plane?
2. Ever heard of...confidential investigations for the official report?
Quote:
|
explain why osama denied it, and then a blatantly fake video appears of him "admitting it was him"
|
Where did he deny it? Give me a legitimate source that is not a conspiracy theorist newspaper. Because in the lighting his nose looks different it's not him? Even though, if you look in the news, you can see things such as "Osama tells Iraqians to fight against Americans"? And this isn't proof of an actual bombing. I can accept the story of a plane being hijacked by America, and that Osama wasn't actually in on it really and framed, but not when the theory includes the thought of bombs being present.