thing is with loose change it presented a lot of theories that were not entirerly accurate and not backed up with a lot of scientific evidence, and the scientific evidence that WAS presented in some cases, was either mis-quoted, real basic, completely incorrect or in some cases the "experts" that were asked weren't the right type of people who should of been answering the questions given to them.

comparisons given eg: the plane that crashed into the pentagon and various other plane crash's were not really good comparisons and thats because they are 2 different types of crash. Also the guy narrating loose change makes assumptions on stuff that clearly has no backing...i.e nothing bunced off the pentagon when the plane hit.

But no-one ever said that debris bounced off the walls...not in no report...only he said that...also the picture of the pentagon where he claims the plane hit he said it didn't match to the build of the plane...YET...move the pic to the left slightly and you can see a better idea or rather a more accurate impact zone

so yeah it's made me see things a little different but i still think something was up that day but i feel that to this day the wrong questions are still being asked.

and i think it's a shame that something so tragic like 9/11 can be disregarded as to all the conspiracy theory's you see on the net and there are LOADS going about...

__________________

MySpace

R.I.P OMB

To Be Honest...I Don't Know Why I Bothered