Either way, I'm sure in theory it is possible. It assists to dispel things such as controlled demolition by giving an alternate theory to some potentially incorrect statement. And if you think I'm contradicting myself now, I'm quite aware.

I don't believe in CD, you do (or so it seems). Fact of the matter is, it's a personal choice and both have their ups and downs and require a certain aspect of belief. You think the explanation sounds dumb, which probably does stem from the fact that your idea opposes mine (if it doesn't, ignore). From my side it seems to be a logical alternative. To me, the idea that multiple thousand pounds of explosives were planted in a building during a relatively small period of time, where there was ironically an evacuation and bomb-detecting dogs brought in due to a bomb threat. I see it as dumb to think people were able to conceal enough bombs to satisfy the needs of theorists in their speculation of the requirements to destroy the WTC.