they say they found bones 3.2-million-year-old in 1974, now these bones are 15000 years older.

OK, I can draw a line between, that, when we talking age, and especially that far back, the diffrence between those two bones would be like drawing two lines on a ants back and claiming ones longer.


I gotta call bullshit on this. Unless I see solid facts in my hands, Im not going to straight away beleive this.

How do they even determine that age of a bone? Obviously do test's, but how fucking accurate can a test of age be?!