Originally Posted by ∆ P E X X

nah man i think you're taking what i'm saying the wrong way. i DON'T think someone on the hood created crack, for the same reasons i listed above. just looking at the events that would have to occur alone, that's outside the bounds of logical reasoning.


well being that i didn't say that people in the hood are special because they cam make a new drug (which is dont' believe to be the case), i also don't believe that any such skills would automatically make you knowledgable on the source of cocaine or not.

those two things would be completely irrelevant.


and no i personally dont' think anyone brought coke into those depressed urban invoronments, though i've heard some pretty convincing arguments pertianing to that, citing such factors as access (cocaine has always had the reputation of being a rich man's drug) which in it self would make cocaine out of reach of those who live in such environments. as a matter of fact, prior to the invasion of cocaine, weed was the popular drug with heroine a small fraction of the market. then after cocaine came crack, which is cheaper than cocaine. you couldn't have a market get into crack without first priming it with cocaine.


mime, i'll speak very candidly with you because i know i can and you won't take it to heart. i'm not one to draw wild conclusions. history has shown time and time again that the white man has systematically tried to ahnialate every race in this country through clandestine means, dating back to christopher columbus giving disease infested blankets to native americans as a... "peace offering". fast foward 500 years, countless agencies have been caught redhanded in carrying out missions that boil down to racial erradication, from funding groups, to instigating feuds, to carrying out sorties directly. i don't accept anything wholey as fact but i also don't put it outside the realm of possibility that the white man has tried yet again to assasinate the racial group he's envied and feared since he crawled from the cave. especially not when all the signs paint a vivid picture of a repeated history.