Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ∆ P E X X
illogical conclusion. that conclusion is a giving up of the logical senses and saying "must be a being i can't fathom, therefore obviously some sort of mysterious god!" vs simply a higher life form.
also, the human body isn't a watch, its biological, it could purely be a result of evolution. hence the critical difference in your argument.
i believe we were created by a higher life, but just looking at your 'argument' objectively this is my observation.
|
Word, I forget who it was who originated that argument, but he jumped the gun a bit. If you think this one is bad, you should see aquinas' arguments. He goes from basically nothing to "God exists." One of his arguments is this:
1) Events happen.
2) Events are caused by other events.
3) There can be no infinite chain of events.
L) There must be a first uncaused cause that began the chain of events.
C) God exists.
It's like whoa, slow down buddy. Not only are his premises crap, he skipped straight to god exists from some shitty thing.