right. the only difference is, there is limitless accounts on historical record of the origins of "christianity" and "cahtolocism" is gnosticism. once again, you didn't see it, so therefore you believe its not true. typical egologic; "i don't see it, there fore it doesn't exist". thoughts liek that is why people thought the earth was flat. or the sun revolved around the earth. or that gravity doesn't exist, and that air and wind are "god", and so on lol.

primitive minds pickling in their own ignorance.

to take it even further, theres evidence that gamaliel led the apostles, the bible even states so directly. now imagine a man so wise that jesus would hand over the leadership of the apostles to him. gamaleil in the bible is refered to as "the great teacher" yet the bible omits who he's taught because whomever edited it obviously if it was left in there you'd be able to put 2 and 2 together. but we know that jesus knew him, AND trusted him enough to lead the apostles!! now jesus wouldnt' trust a stranger, would he? a man he's had noexperience and interaction with, would he? hell, even a man the apostles had never met before now would he? wow, what a coincidence, the bible even omits the entire span of jesus' life where he "grew up". all you know is he was born, then disappeared for a while, and came back with knowledge of the source all things (or came back as what you would call a "source-erer" today). and in typical fool fashion you're perfectly complaicent with believing that's all that happened.

its pathetic man.

you're not even factually qualified to have this level of a discussion with me if you still believe "jesus" was really dudes name.

please, once again, equip your self with knowledge.

__________________