Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2v
SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT RELIGION IF YOU ARE ATHEIST.
Perfect example why?
your idol, Charles Darwin. Let's take the flying spaghetti monster under consideration, no one gives a flying fuck about a flying spaghetti monster because it doesn't exist. You don't sit there and bitch about it and preach it like the believers, you just ignore it and don't let it get to you. This is because you are atheist and have no opinion about Religion except you don't believe in it.
Now if you're gonna sit there and try to convert believers, call them stupid, whatever you would like, you are NOT an atheist. You are fighting the believers of God, and since you are sitting there giving a flying fuck, you are admitting to defeat already. Nearly saying "I believe in God exists and that's why I have to fight him, that's why I give a shit and that's what I'm doing in this conversion method". You are almost making your anti-God ways a Religion in itself. Notice the word Almost, you couldn't possibly be actually doing it, but you're nearing it, asshole.
So, if you're a true atheist, you don't let God get to you. You know he doesn't exist and you, in the words of Mr. T, pity the fools. But until/when and IF you make it your sworn duty to fuck with other people's heads and Religions, you are no longer Atheist, just Anti-God.
Realize the difference, and shut the fuck up.
pz
|
Wait a second....
So Atheists that argue against the existence of God are no longer Atheist, they are "anti-God?" You know, I'd like to meet an Atheist that was pro-God, or even an Atheist that had a neutral standpoint regarding the existence of God. That would be pretty funny.
Atheism
is not believing in God. Why does it make somebody any less Atheist if they preach against the existence of God? Are people not allowed to share their beliefs with others?
Quote:
It's like arguing against the fact that nothing exists.
You're making it exist by acknowledging it. Need it explained again in a different choice of words buddy?
|
I will propose an argument against the existence of nothing.
Nothing does not exist in the universe. By nothing, I don't mean the absence of matter known as empty space, I mean true nothingness.
Nothing as in the complete absence of anything. Matter, space, energy, anything. That "nothing" cannot possibly exist, because it is defined by total non-existence. IF it were to exist, it wouldn't, because anything that exists is not the absence of existence.
So basically, my argument is that non-existence cannot possibly exist, for obvious reasons. I don't believe me talking about it has made it exist. Me talking about it as an abstract concept, a mere thought, doesn't actually make the subject of the thought exist in the universe. All it does is make chemicals in my brain do all sorts of things and electrical impulses in my nervous system fire around a bit. Nothingness doesn't appear in my head or on this screen when I talk about it.
Me arguing against the existence of a four sided triangle does not mean that it exists. Your logic doesn't make sense.