okay, let me break this down for you... you need to lay off the White Castle and start paying attention.

so, you made the statement:
"yea, seeing as he hasn't hit many clutch shots in his career, that's REAL ironic. =/"

so, you are now saying that you were being sarcastic by making that statement. which would mean that in reality what you meant was that it is NOT ironic that Nash missed the shot in my video game (which at this point you thought i was being serious about) because he DOES hit clutch shots all the time in real life. i come to this conclusion because the "REAL ironic" hints sarcasm that you actually think it ISN'T ironic, and you already stated that you were saying he does hit clutch shots all the time.

so, we come to this non-sarcastic statement: "It is NOT ironic that Nash missed a game winning shot, because he DOES make them all the time in real life."

maybe you need to look up the word "irony" in the dictionary.


look, it is really out of my personality to go into this much detail analyzing something like this on the internet, but please, Spully boy...

Do not EVER again in your precious little e-life try talking down to somebody smarter than you saying some stupid shit like "you suck at making arguments" when the whole basis of your "argument," when it comes down the the technicalities that you wanted so bad to act like you understood, makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

now PLEASE tell me you were able to follow that.

__________________