^wait what are you talking about? lol

and Enygma you're wrong. In a pressure game, crunch time wouldn't just be a last second shot. Yea, that's for your best shooter. I'm talking, like less than 8 mins or even sometimes entire 4th quarter. Duncan did that last night. He was trying to keep spurs in it. Even announcers were saying "This is the time for Duncan to be selfish, and take it to the hole" or some shit.

and Shaq WAS clutch. He'd still post up late in games, and either get his shots, or create openings with the doubles and triple teams he got.

Garnett really doesn't do that. Look @ game 5. Word he had 33 pts. BUT... his last fg of the game came with NINE minutes left in 4th. NINE. he missed like 4 or 5 jumpshots within that 9 mins. and then had like 2 fts made. You're telling me Celtics just needed their guards for that rest of 9 mins? noo...

and then tonight, there he is, only 10 pts. Game 7 v.s Cavs, only 13 pts.

I don't even know why you bring Shaq. Shaq consistently put down over 25 pts, play-offs or regular season in his prime.

I don't see Garnett doing all that.

and another reason you'd have weird logic my NYG enygma, is if Garnett is the Celts BEST player. What makes it eright for him to take a back seat when it's a close game in the 4th quarter? That's where he needs to take off and dominate inside, or with the jump shot. Late game last second situations, THOSE are for your best jump shooters. But Shaq, Duncan, they all step it up and that's who their respective teams look for down low to get that bucket in a back and forth contest.

You're mistaking what I'm saying bout being a clutch crunch time player with being a last second shooter.

__________________