View Single Post
Old 09-06-08, 12:04 PM   #111
Magic5
Moderator
 
Posts: 3,918
From: Denver, CO
IP:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunday Blay
^ ? seriously? look kid, YOU're the one who clearly didn't read my post. your whole defense once again was "i'm not talking about the rich." do i need to quote myself? YOU AREN'T RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. this isn't a debate over voting for Mimesis. so what you're "talking about" is irrelevant. the facts are that the ONLY group of Americans that have benefited economically from Bush's term is the top 1%. PLEASE try and prove otherwise... and PLEASE stop saying that i haven't read your posts and actually respond to mine. and writing off everything i say by saying that everything liberals say is "political bullshit" isn't a response.


Look, you fucking retard, OBAMA'S NOT GOING TO BE TAXING THE SHIT OUT OF JUST THE TOP 1% OF THE POPULATION. HE'S GOING TO BE TAXING THE SHIT OUT OF MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLE, AND THAT'S WHY I'M TALKING ABOUT THEM. The fact is, you don't fucking know what you're talking about and you're stupid to realize it. And sounds good, I'll find my economics folder on Monday (I have it stored at a locker in the library on campus) and post up the actual figures for you. You're fucking stupid, Bush's tax cuts didn't just help the top 1% of the population. You're wrong, period, and even after I prove it to you I know you'll still keep spewing inaccurate bullshit.

And I laugh at you calling me kid. My knowledge of the economy towers yours, you fucking idiot.

I've responded to yours, what the fuck? It's just kind of hard when you're STILL saying Obama is only helping the top 1% of the population. What do you want me to say other then, "You're wrong." YOU ARE WRONG. I can't argue a point that doesn't fucking exist. You saying only the top 1% is going to be helped isn't accurate, so of course I have no fucking response to that argument.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimesis
And yes, the redistribution of wealth in a nation IS socialist, period. Raising taxes to outrageous levels IS socialist. Taxes are a socialist concept by themselves, but we need them, and that's why I've never argued to abolish them. However, when you start taxing the shit out of middle class people to give to the lower class people it is socialism. That's not propaganda, are you fucking stupid? Explain to me how that is not the redistribution of wealth and I will gladly say it is not socialist.


Please, since you so conveniently forgot, explain to me how redistributing the wealth of a country is not socialism. I can't wait to see what bullshit you can make up!
  Reply With Quote