Let's see. .

I killed 2v in the last thread he disagreed with me by showing how he contradicted himself, when, after a few pages, he tried to backstep when he realized he was wrong and claimed he never said something that he did. I pointed it out to him and he chose not to respond (good choice).

I've shown multiple times in multiple threads that Pinky doesn't know what he's talking about because he can't even read.

Adam still hasn't responded to the first question I asked in response to his claim that McCain is a dumbfuck:



I disagree with Blay about everything, so there's no point in responding when I already know the end of the road will be a few pages later and no progress in either direction.

So that leaves TeamOne who brought absolutely nothing to the table. A lot of what happens in the stock market is speculative, and I offered my opinion for that speculation. I didn't try to persuade anybody, as I clearly stated, "In my opinion," leaving adequate room for people to disagree with me. I've already discussed the adverse effects Obama's bullshit tax policies will have on the economy in previous threads, so unless you can counter my claim I'm going to stop responding to you. I'm not interested in saying something, then having somebody else make some sarcastic remark about how I'm wrong, but offer no reason or explanation for how I'm wrong. That just leads me to believe you don't know what you're talking about because if you knew I was wrong and knew why I was wrong, you'd tell me. The fact you'd rather throw out a few comments about my so-called, "warped logic" instead of responding to what I actually said, suggests you have no response to what I actually said.

We can theorize all day about what's caused the stock market to decrease over the past few days, but can any one of you dispute my opinion with facts? I already know you can't but feel free to try.