There was a basic philosophy in this was was repeated a couple of times. To good effect. Rather than take the more complicated 'road'. You take the more simpler one. Now the simpler one is harder in the short term. And maybe more dangerouns. But how much would you have to go through if you took the former? The obstacles..especially of emotions and 'reason' would probably make it more difficult. And who knows, it might be more dangerous too..so in a way, it is conflicting. Philosophy? Er...to take the more straightforward and 'truth' ridden path and follow it rigidly as possible till you see the light? Rather than the more complicated one which'll take you here and there and end up hurting you more?...hmmm....

It had a core simplicity to it. Which made it come off well. It was what it was.

I dunno about the first part of what i said. Maybe i'm digging to much. I dunno why philosophy came into mind. As it is relatively vague in that sense. I guess....(?!?!)...

...resp...