Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cola
if their is no self, what is the purpose of trying to improve one's self by reading this book?
hes making contradicting statments and not establishing a base point. which makes his conculsions not really a ideolgeoy to live by, more of an illusion of ideas which you should try to base your thought process around.
|
Have you read the book? If so, please explain how he's making contradicting statements. If not, then what the fuck are you talking about? Read the book before you make claims like 'he's not establishing a base point.' It seems obvious to me he does establish many interesting points.
I gave you 1 sentence about the conclusion he reaches and you dudes jump on me trying to show how he's wrong without even reading his arguments. Read his arguments and then tell me where he goes wrong because I'm having a hard time finding a spot where he makes a mistake.