Dawkins did bring up a few points and expanding on them in a manner I hadn't thought before, though it's obvious now. Like people saying that things are so complex in nature God had to make them, (usually incorrectly quoting Darwin out of context, and a lot of quoting out of context happens on the side of creationists and opposers, but they really do love quoting christian literature disproven twenty years ago with their little salt and sun and moon dust 'facts'), like this really complex tree. Of course if it's that complex, the person who made it had to be more complex, so you really can't use complexity as an argument. Of course I always knew this, and that the probability of life generating on its own isn't that wild compared to a perfect being generating onits own, but he put it into a good perspective.

And of course the book has flaws.