3D is cool and all, but I don't see it as the next "advancement" in cinema that everyone is trying to pin it as. I think in order for it to really take off and become the next big thing, they've got to somehow come up with a way to do it without the glasses.

I don't have any desire to see the film, but I am curious as to how well the 3D was executed. Was it believable or just kind of an added bonus that they could've done without?

__________________