In the New Testament, Jesus had his final meal with his 12 disciples. No where does it say in the bible that Mary Magdalene was there.

The famous painting of the Last Supper was done by Da Vinci. If you notice, he made Jesus and his Disciples look conspicuously European. Jesus looked almost effeminate. Therefore, suggesting that Mary Magdalene is really "John the apostle" is asinine because Da Vinci isn't a bible authority. It's simply a painting.




1

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

Man.... Big deal..

Ultimatly it doesent change anything... Its very unlikly the man Yeshua Bin Yosef would stay unmarried back in those times... However at the end of the day, who gives a flying fuck...

History is nothing more than an agreed upon account of past events... You can never really know the truth unless you were there yourself..

So dont even try and stick up for the church on bias alone because its useless... We do however know the church has a large history of deceit and bullshit stemming throughout its history..

So I would advise looking into your sources before you pick sides.

__________________
RIP jono, peace out bboy.
Pardon Canada Criminal Record Pardons Services Toronto

I like the way you completely avoid the mention that Mary Magdalene was a deciple and focus on the Whitenizing of the "last supper". Didn't the other deciples get jealous that she was recieving special word directly from Jesus and they weren't?


yup.


so if they say Jesus ate with all the deciples, who do you think is gonna be present?

man, I thought this was called cerebral approach?

__________________

have faith in q's ability to dodge questions man. he'll come up with some way he can avoid that too, believe me.

__________________

see? tolja.


someoen else quoted it and he STILL dodged it. See, he's a certified bitch son. once his argument starts to fall apart, he's gone.

__________________

Lmao @ Q getting silenced. This is a first.

I'm sorry...But, in your zeal to put your foot in your mouth, you weren't aware of the fact that I have Apexx on ignore now, and just got back here to check this thread.


neway...



There's nothing else to be said. Nos always disagrees with me for the sake of disagreeing. I could say, "Q is gay"...and, He'd say, "No, he's str8" just to make an ass of himself.



Nuff said.


Uppin this for more peeps








1

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

ladies and gentlemen, look closely because this is an example of ignorance at it's finest. A person who intentionally keeps themself misinformed...just so they have a "I didn't know any better" ignorance pass so they can continue to talk about something that's completely non-factual.

they want to ignore the facts so they can reinforce their beliefs, which is why this indivudial put me on ignore.

mentally he has no real strength. only the percieved strength that he finds in his ignorance. thats why his mind crumbles so easily. He can't survive under the weight of an argument that's based on fact.

class dismissed.

__________________

*Grabs backpack and heads out of thread*

Q if jesus had a child he would be hated by god
because remember those angels that had sex with humans he banned them from heaven
because of that

__________________

Back in that time, a father was to train his son in his trade, provide for him, and ultimately find him a wife. Joseph did 2 of those things, I doubt he would, as a father, not do the third. It is very likely that Jesus had a wife, whether they did anything I don't know, but the chances are high for Jesus to have a wife.

__________________

No where in scripture does it even suggest Jesus had a wife. The bible does say he was tempted in every way as man was. But, the bible also says he was faultless. If you don't believe that, then, why call it the bible?

I don't see how people are mixing in false doctrines into the bible.


Re-writing history is a dangerous thing.



1

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

Marrying does not imply sin at all, it is what God plans on people doing, what he wants us to do. It is sex outside of wedlock and audultry that is the sin.

__________________

Once again, there's nothing in the bible to suggest Jesus was ever married, or even contemplated it. It's a false doctrine bro.

I'm real concerned about Christians entertaining this nonsense.

I should come up with my own theories. Like, Jesus was actually gay.

Think about it. There are scriptures that say, "John was the disciple that Jesus LOVED." and, there's a scripture that says a man "rested in his bosom"

People are simply attempting to discredit Jesus and deny his deity.


That's a shame.

PS...Marriage isn't for everyone. Jesus attitude on marriage was "it is for whom it's for"...And, he spefically talked about how divorce is sinful. The Apostle Paul never married and suggested that if people could remain single and do the will of God, that'd be ideal. He recognized that was impossible for MOST, not all, MOST people though.


1

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"