Man, you're going way off issue now. Talking about naimals eating their young and likening it to cannibalism is unrealistic seeing that animals eat their young to preserve their food source by having one less mouth to feed. You're speculating now, not speaking facts. I'm looking for facts.
------------------------------------------------
^well the king didn't have food so wouldn't it be right if i said he ate his son to preserve his own food source by having one less mouth to feed??like you said with the animals..isnt that the same thing???

You also said:
AHAHAHAHAHA. For starters, "The Great Flood" didn't destroy the world lmao ahahahahhaha. Think about it man...seriously..if noah suppsoedly took 2 of every animal (even those that DON'T LIVE ANYWHERE NEAR THE CLIMATE THIS IS SAID TO TAKE PLACE - Like Polar Bears, Seals, Penguins, etc) on his Ark and it was packed so tight that there was only room for him, not even the exotic breeds of plant life that outnumber humans and animals alike. - then where'd everyone else come from? There's no 2 humans on the ark homey. No wat the flood could have "destroyed the world" like you say it would have.

Think about it man. Seriously.

Secondly, Unlike the Flood of Egypt, There are NO high water marks on monuments (like the one on Sphynx) ANYWHERE to prove that ANY flood occured ANYWHERE!!!!

Third, how could the flood cover the entire world. Think about it man. Floods come form bodies of water (vapor or not) moving to new locations and unleashing the torrent. That's a movement of water. Where would all this extra water come from to flood the entire globe?? Water never leaves the earth, it evaporates and falls again as rain, so where did this extra water get shipped in from to flood the earth?

And finally, lets pretend that this flood happened, that wouldn't have destroyed the earth. That would have (supposedly) killed all the life on the planet shor to what was on the Ark. Not destroy the earth. That'd be like saying you taking a bath would be destroying your body, which is...UNpossible
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First of all it wasn't just Noah, he had a wife and 3 sons i believe and they each had a wife......just to clear that up.......and we are talking about GOD here he doesn't have to stick to the rules of science and evaportation, he MADE it rain for 40 days and 40 nigths non-stop,

Also:
That would have (supposedly) killed all the life on the planet shor to what was on the Ark. Not destroy the earth. That'd be like saying you taking a bath would be destroying your body, which is...UNpossible.

He did not destroy earth, the bible said he destroyed the WORLD meaning humans, plants, everything on it.....and you provided the perfect example with the bath thing...

You take a bath and destroy the dirt, fungus, what ever it maybe on you,
GOD flooded destroyed the world, humans, plants

Your body you don't destroy you just cleanse it
The Earth GOD didn't destroy he cleansed it from the evil that overcame it...Enough Said

Nope. THE KING has food. He's the king and gets provided for first and above anyone else. How is this even an issue??


ok, so you're saying that 8 people repopulated the entire planet of all these various races and cultures that are known to exist without interruption throughout time? cmon man, be realistic.

Also, We both (for discussional purposes) agree that it rained, why are you trying to prove something that's esablished? My question is "where did all this EXTRA water to raise ALL water levels globally like you're saying come from"?


He didn't destory the earth? That's funny, because I could have swore that's exactly what you meant when you said:



Isn't this you leaping in the defense of "how and where "God" destroyed the earth"?? smh...



I'm glad you said that because now you finally see what it is I'm trying to say. You taking a bath dosen't destroy your body (like I just said) yet, you see that a flood on the earth destroys the earth?....yeah.


P.S. Using quotes would be nice, so I can make out what you're trying to say from what I already said.

__________________

yes i am saying those 8 people re-popuated...we started with Adam and Eve right?? that was just 2 and they seemed to populate just fine....

He didn't destroy the Earth meaning the planet...when 'I' say world im refering to like the humans, plants, structures like the physical stuff.....sorry I could have worded it better....

but I'm tired...we def. should finish this convo on Aim or somethin 2-morrow its interesting hearing the "other" side of things and healthy i think...my aim is lyricalyillest33

I'm glad you mentioned that, because this is where the lies in the bible start to unravel. Right at the beginning.

Adam and Eve, first two people right?

Adam and eve had two sons (Cain and Able) right, one killed the other? Now look what happened to Cain after he killed his brother and got banished:


Hol up..rewind for a second..so cain gets to this new town east of Eden and lays with his wife?? Wait..his Wife????? That would mean that she is obviously around his age and old enough to reproduce, which means she had to simultaneously exist around the same time that HE did. Yet the bible makes no mention of cain having any sisters, nor adam and eve having any daughters and furthermore, they don't say "cain laid with his sister". She was obviosuly someone completely irrelevant to their lineage, so where did she come from?

No way that Adam and Eve populated the earth by them selves and the bible blows their own spot on this numerous times over.


I wish I had that picture bible I used to eread as a kid because it showed cain and his wife in a city with people in it. "How'd they get there" is one of the first questions I asked about the bible, which was the start of me getting kicked out of bible classes by 16 and causing my instructor to cry. Definitely not fun lol.



"the world as we know it". But even that stilldosen't add up to the fact that water dosen't multiply it self, it just moves, so to flood th entire globe would be literally impossible. Even if all the polar icecaps melted, the globe still wouldn't be flooded. The bible tells some stories that are simply complete fabrications man. The Great Flood is one of countless.


I'm down for that. But why not here where everyone can learn from the findings?

__________________

people are delicious

__________________

cain and able were the first songs, but it sayz in the bible that adam and eve had 100's of kidz.

__________________
Hez back with a vengeance.

never..................

__________________
Im Back So Smoke Something

Geological studies show that's it's scientifically impossible for the Great Flood to have occured...ask any knowledgeable geologist..p.

where does it say that? Eve is a mortal human being, and as a matter of fact, one of the first mortal human beings supposedly. Therefore it would be IMPOSSIBLE for her to have "100's" of children.

For others reading this,
I'm also still looking to see where it said God destroyed the world and where god suppsedly said "I regret making humanity" as have been suggested.

__________________

This is actually one of the issues I have with the bible, reconciling the creation account to what really happened. Some people have speculated that "Adam" and "Eve" represented a nation of people, not just two.

Here's the problem with thinking Adam and Eve were one man and one woman.

They had two kids at first, Cain and Abel. THat means, there were literally just FOUR PEOPLE on earth at the time. However, after Cain killed Abel, God banished him out of his home land. Cain then said, "God, what if someone tries to kill me." Then, God replied, "I'll put a mark on your head and you will be safe." <--I'm paraphrasing. If there were only 3 people on earth at the time, what in the WORLD was Cain talking about?

I actually support the Adam/Eve nation theory.

However, it also would have been possible for eve to have 100s of kids. People in those days lived hundreds of years. Remeber, the oldest living person in the bible lived to be over 900 years old, Methuselah.


P.S. The account of God's flooding of the earth is in Genesis, as well as the statement, "It repented him that he made man." God felt sorry that so much wickedness had overrun the earth. So, he put an end to it.

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

It's just a theory, which means it proves nada. If the bible adressed nations as the source of humanity, it would have said nations. not two individual people. This fits into the schools of thought that "interpret the bible to mean sometihng much different than what it clearly states".


Adam and Eve died early and are not methusela. They were supposed to live forever up till they ate the fruit of the tree, which is SUPPOSEDLY why women menstruate which also is BS, since "jesus died for your sins" which means the slate should have been wiped clean, yet women today still mensturate and bleed.



Once again, there is zero evidence of this flood since other civilaztions that existed around this time have obviosuly survuved since their history is still shown and make no mention of a flood at all. There are countless billions of artifacts that are found that predate this imaginary flood, which according to the bible should have been destroyed in the flood that no one can prove occured. Floods leave high water marks. This "great flood" left none. Floods cause land masses to rise. This flood caused none. Furthermore, no possible way that moses and his 3 sons, plus all 4 of their wives repopulated the earth. The variety of people and cultures alone shows that this is nonsense.


Not to mention the fact that all this EXTRA water that flooded the entire planet came from where exactly? Floods are bodies of water that move from one location to another, and the earth only has but so much water on it. Where'd the extra trillions upon trilions of gallons needed to flood the entire planet come from? and where did it all go?

If it evaporated, that means it went into the atmosphere and would have fallen back down as rain, which means the continents of earth would ALWAYS be submersed in this flood, which we obviously know they aren't.

__________________

Moses wasn't alive during the flood...Noah was

The bible doesn't state that, "ALL LIFE DIED OUT". The bible states that God flooded the earth 40 days and 40 nights. Some people like to try to discredit the bible by talking about Sumerian tablets which also talk about a "great flood" before Moses wrote about it. To me, that's simply confirmation. When it started raining, people were still alive on earth. These cultures could have written about what God did. That's not out of the realm of possibility. Also, before it rained on Noah, it had NEVER RAINED BEFORE ON EARTH. That's why people were looking at him strange when he talked about "rain." God watered the land with dew. Before then, there was no precipitation. Biblical scholars corroborate this through the creation account and the incidents surrounding Noah and the ark. God flooded the earth. It's clearly stated. Don't say it's not written in the bible. If you don't believe it happened, fine. But, don't dare say the account isn't given in the text because it is.

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

http://community.rapverse.com/showp...33&postcount=69

who did you confuse me with...

__________________

The Flood was 'God-Willed' God created the Earth he doesn't have to stick to the 'laws of nature' , if he wanted to add "trillions of gallons" of water to the earth he would do so, and then if he wanted he would take it back he would do that too...