http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay...&q=loose+change

^ some dude used the loose change video and is arguing points while it plays...

i'm watching it now

__________________

MySpace

R.I.P OMB

To Be Honest...I Don't Know Why I Bothered

word to the carol vorderman plant disolving bit, i've seen that before and it' why i knew when man was chattin bout debris that i knew it was possible for planes to atomise on impact

__________________

MySpace

R.I.P OMB

To Be Honest...I Don't Know Why I Bothered

I'll have to watch this after I get off of work.

__________________
Soundclick
NEW Myspace

i love the crap grammar the guy who typed up used and still said "corrections by" lol

but watch it...it's mad interesting

__________________

MySpace

R.I.P OMB

To Be Honest...I Don't Know Why I Bothered

i watched a little of it....the guy makes some good corrections...some not so good....but i'm going to watch teh rest of it after my 11:20 classs this morning....ima see what is really up. because even though i have only watched a little of this 'screw loose change', i'm still siding with what Loose Change mostly has done and presented throughout their documentary....

but all that could change....who knows...has it changed for you mad dog? or did you never agree with what loose change had to say

__________________
Hello everyone

thing is with loose change it presented a lot of theories that were not entirerly accurate and not backed up with a lot of scientific evidence, and the scientific evidence that WAS presented in some cases, was either mis-quoted, real basic, completely incorrect or in some cases the "experts" that were asked weren't the right type of people who should of been answering the questions given to them.

comparisons given eg: the plane that crashed into the pentagon and various other plane crash's were not really good comparisons and thats because they are 2 different types of crash. Also the guy narrating loose change makes assumptions on stuff that clearly has no backing...i.e nothing bunced off the pentagon when the plane hit.

But no-one ever said that debris bounced off the walls...not in no report...only he said that...also the picture of the pentagon where he claims the plane hit he said it didn't match to the build of the plane...YET...move the pic to the left slightly and you can see a better idea or rather a more accurate impact zone

so yeah it's made me see things a little different but i still think something was up that day but i feel that to this day the wrong questions are still being asked.

and i think it's a shame that something so tragic like 9/11 can be disregarded as to all the conspiracy theory's you see on the net and there are LOADS going about...

__________________

MySpace

R.I.P OMB

To Be Honest...I Don't Know Why I Bothered

yeah, alright... most of Loose Change was bullshit, you're an idiot if you dont realize that. but the thing is, Loose Change is not the only source that backs up the parts of it that are not bullshit. there are books written about what our government was involved in, and we just saw yesterday the Pres of Venezuela speaking out on the subject... so you just have to use your brian.

plus notice the fact that is you go to cnn.com or fox news they dont mention shit about what the ven pres said
also that attack on the us embassy in syria.......syria says they believe the us orchestrated the attck on their own embassy.......
let me get the link

its hard to beleive anything these days..but i think what we all can agree on is..
something extremely fishy went on that day

__________________
Hello everyone