this was pathetic...
battle rhyming isn't about who came harder, it's about lyricism....
lyricism is about metaphors, rhyme skill (multisyllable), complexity of your bars (switching in between lines), and other things....


I was a 1,000,000 times better with multi's...

I was better with wordplay/metaphors/similes/contrasts through lines/and it made more sense!!

LASTLY, THE IDIOT MADE NO SENSE...:
BaLLisTiK has a total different pronunciation of those words he was trying to play around with. Asshole...it isn't Ball istik..
It' BaLLisTiK as in Ballistic as in Ballistic missile or as in ballistic (crazy)....

'balls-is'a-roach' & 'balls-you-lick' makes no sense at all...
that's just moronic from any horizon approached since it doesn't resemble Ballistic/BaLLisTiK at all...

So his verse practically had no sense in through interpretation if you look at it from any angle...I could understand if he actually broke my alias down correctly (which he was way way off)

So supposedly: the only advantage he had on me was he came "HARDER"....
But a emceeing battle is about lyricism and in LYRICISM AND EMCEEING, I destroyed him in every angle and category of what makes a solid emcee. I hit 'em harder and broke through while he came with single syllable and pitiful rhymes.......

How hard is it to rhyme blade and grenade???
That's what lyricism is about. Who can rhyme better, and come with wordplay and metaphors...not who can talk about destroying each other's organs better...practically making the votes ridiculous. I rhymed a minimum of 3 syllables except on one occasion.......

CASE CLOSED!