thats the most un-true statement/s i've ever heard or read anywhere...it does not say that anywhere in the bible..and i know that for a fact...the only thing you have close to being remotely correct....is there is some speculation if jesus was actually hung on a cross, or if he was hung on a tree in the forest. It's well know that aramaic is a lost language, and that is the language of the original scripture. and lately, there has been some dispute on whether or not there are references to jesus being hung on a tree, in a forest, instead of on a cross, on a hill top. Think about what your saying. The demons that went into him, are gonna give birth to the devils son.

1...these are not tangible beings, unless obviously they are manifested in something...so to give birth, would be to create something un-tangible, like themselves.
2. If they were manifsted in someone or something that is capable of birth, it wouldn't really make sense. Because as far as I know, they can't pass down genetics, (because they are fucking spiritual beings) and if they could, why would they do that with only satans son, and not every demon that resides in the bowels of hell, thatd be an easy way to take over the world.
3. how can it be satans son, with satan isn't taking action in the process of it's birth? aka...not getting another demon pregnant...
4...i could go on for days on why this doesn't make sense..whoever told you that(don't lie, you didn't read it in the bible) is full of shit

__________________

Time is not long, and indecision is hells cemment. So the well is rented, untill heaven is relevant. Untill then, to be eloquent, sex cells, so le'ts cellibate.

"watch what you watchin...fox keeps feedin' us toxin's..stop sleepin' start thinkin outside of the box and unplug from the matrix doctrine....but watch what you say cause big brother is watchin" - nas - sly fox

The I.H.C.J.S.F.M.T.R.H.P.M.M.W.T.S.M.S.I.T.F.F.W.A.S. O Crew