^^^^^please excuse 2v he is a moron..

__________________

"the loudest one in the room is the weakest"- frank lucas..

lol @ saying that the 'Great Whore' would be the Christian relgion itself.

So by that logic.....

God creates the church....then the church is the one who puts the revlations into motion by being 'the great whore'

lol...hahahahahah.....amazing

__________________

The European Union did not create a new country out of it. I am basing my statements off of what has already occured through the EU and then translating them over to what an NAU would entail.

Canada would be one country including provinces and territories. The United States would be one country including all 50 states. Mexico would be another country. Its simple logic if you look at the EU and compare, did any country that join lose their "country" did any country that joined lose their major cities / provinces? No. They are independent sovereign countries. However in the EU these countries come together as states. So if we use the same logic, the NAU would have 3 states, USA, Canada, & Mexico. That is what I am basing my statements off of, as it seems logical. Why would the US enter a NAU and give up their 50 states, why would Canada enter the NAU and give up their provinces and territories.... it seems like a ridiculous idea in my mind if the NAU was constructed that way and it would not work, nor would anyone agree to it, especially the united states.

back to your first question as I dealt with them in opposite order,

I do not believe one world government is even possible. Not to venture off into a religious debate, but look at the religious wars and conflicts that have been taking place for decades, look at the conflicts between the US and Iraq / Iran etc. A utopian society where everything is run by one government is just not possible. I could not see it ever happening in my lifetime. First of all you'd have to get every country to agree to join said unions and then every union must agree to merge and recreate laws an everything. It just wouldnt be possible to do so. Creating one general law consensus would not be able to be enforced, as the western world is quite different from the eastern world / middle eastern world. I dont see it happening, nor do I think it would be a good thing.

As I previously stated, in the case of the NAU treaties bills and acts would better suit the countries involved as there is too much to lose and not enough to gain.

The NAU in conjunction with the UN.

These two are a team.

Could it not be said the "People's government" of America, is now a Shadow government, trading the liberties of the people for its own 'Security' ?

Edit:
Let me share something with ya, White.



Lmao. I love political comics.

__________________
██â€-█████████▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓▓▓██████████████████ ██↑
██‡████████▒▓▓█████▓▓██████▓▓▓█████████████▓▓▓██ ██|
██‡███████▒▓▓██████▓▓▓███████▓▓███████████▓▓█▓▓█ ██|
██‡███████████████▓▓▓▒███▌████▓▓█████████▓▓███▓▓ ██|
██‡█████████████▓▓▓▒████▌▌▌████▓▓███████▓▓████▓█ ██|
██‡███████████▓▓▓▒█████▌▌▌▌▌▄███▓▓█████▓▓███████ ██|
██‡█████████▓▓▓▒█████████████████▓▓███▓▓████████ ██|
██‡███████▓▓▓▓▒███████████████████▓▓█▓▓█████████ ██|
██‡███████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌████████████▓▓▓██████████ ██|

again.....2v is a drug addict

__________________

I KNEW you were a regular info wars visitor. I could just tell by the way you talked. It's finally confirmed.