LMAO @ him owning the world

This is a misperception...Darwin couldn't have renounced his "theories" because Evolution is not a theory. What you don't understand is this. Evolution can be broken down on a MACRO and MICRO level. Evolution DEFINITELY occurs on a MICRO level. That's proven without doubt. That simply means things change over time. THAT'S 100% true. The argument stems from whether or not MACRO evolution occurred. That is the theory that all life stemmed from a primordial soup that formed in a pond eons ago.
That's the conflict. Darwin is the father of modern biology. Don't fool yourself. Evolution occurs.period. It can EASILY be proven in laboratory experiments on a MICRO level.

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

I wrote a track about this.... it's pretty funny... People still believe it and argue it so hard even tho the one man who created the entire "idea", denounced all his theories. haha. And he denounced 'the big bang' not evolution. word.

ps - Judicial & Lady Fiyah, props on knowin ya stuff - I had to get back to Dooms cause I had to do some readin up on all that old stuff.... I don't think I ever even read 2 Kings, and I forgot about the Deuteronomy thing. Good points.

__________________

__________________

__________________

We did.

and to think one man created this world is 'LUDACRIS'

__________________

GOD is more than a man...."All powerfull and All knowing" he can do what ever he wants, anything you can think of, being appropriate of course lol....

No...evolutionists don't believe we evolved from MOnkies...Their theory is that humans ARE apes, not that we evolved from monkies. Monkies and apes are different. Lemme break it down:

Their conjecture is this:

Modern humans and Chimps had ONE COMMON ancestor. Call that "animal a".

The theory is that some geological catastrophe drastically changed the environment in which ANIMAL A lived, causing a rift between some ANIMAL As on one side, while some ANIMAL As were on the other side. The belief is that a volcanic-type disaster created two dratically different landscapes. On one side, the land was barren and empty. On the other side, trees remained. Evolutionists believe that the ANIMAL As on the side with the trees evolved into Chimps, while the ANIMAL As on the barren side evolved into people.

^^It's more complex than that. But, that's the theory in a nutshell.
ANIMAL "A"

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

__________________

You have a point...

if people wanna base their lives on believing in an imagenary friend, thats their choice.

__________________

....I aint trynna offend anyone right now.

__________________

__________________

''gotta wash dishes''

*Holds back from typing any sexually discrimating remarks*

__________________

As I recall, Darwin's sister was the only person present when he died and it's her word that he actually denounced his thoughts...even if he had, it was probably because he was trying to repent because the fear of even the slim possibilty of hell existing would lead him to eternal suffering. But, denouncing all of that would leave him in a position to have a better chance at reaching paradise, and if he didn't...well, so what? He would be dead, and the path of the world would not matter to him in the slightest because he'd cease to exist. Simply put, he was a fearful man --- which is most likely, though this is obviously speculation ---, his sister lied, or he truly did not believe in what he had spent decades working on.

He created the theory that has been expounded on by others...evolution is still speculation but provides a more believable aspect to life, and gives you the choice of which you believe is more ridiculous...evolution or creationism.

I'm doing a paper on this for History class and I have some notes jotted down somewhere, I'll find specific names for the branching theory and the common ancestor in a bit...I know animal A has a name that starts with an 's'.

Let me find the thoughts of Darwinists on the deathbed statement in which Darwin supposedly denounces his theories...

http://www.myspace.com/charles_darwin_evolution

Unfortunately, myspace blogs are apparently down for construction, so I'll look for another site debating the authenticity of denouncement.