How the hell can they get info from feb 06 when there was no census in feb 06?

Sure that page might have been updated in feb 06 with information about the race riots...

But there is no possible way they could have obtained any new information on that date about statistics of different color percentages..

Your arguments are dumb... Just face it and move on.. Theres no point arguign with you because your not being intelligent here.. Your just nit picking and pretending to be right.... I have no interest in discussing anything with you....

And the 'other' is torris straight islanders.. I knew other looked weird.. And then it clicked....

__________________
RIP jono, peace out bboy.
Pardon Canada Criminal Record Pardons Services Toronto

mmmmm NAH, Not buyin it. You're still duckin the issue. Here it is again

Now you got 2 questions to answer in this thread alone

The oldest source on that page is from feb 2006. It says so right in the "History" tab. Please learn to read.

1: Also, what happened to this "other" that you didn't even think existed, where'd that come from??? You swore that I made that up and I sure didn't. You swore that this info is old, and it ain't older thna feb 06.

2: Quote:
So
92% white
+7% asian and/or middle eastern
+1% Aboriginal/"other"
--------------------
= 100%

So the black people that you say is missing and unnacounted for from your national CENSCUS that "dosen't tell you everything" what percentage are they over this 100%? another 13%? 15%?

You can't even count man. First you deny that it says "and other" then you try to make up something for the same words you KNEW weren't there in the first place - and now you can't even count!!!!

Why do you bother? Do you hate your self?



Now you're saying I shouldn't believe the census and should believe you. And when you're pinpointed on a real issue, liek a complete lie, you call it "nitpicking" lmao.

And I still haven't seen where there's a a missing portion of this 100% for black people kid. You seem to conveniently forget!

__________________

Because there is no way that they could pull that information out of their ass and have it be 100% correct..

Apexx there IS guesswork in those figures..
You assume them to be fact..

And even though a census doesent cover skin pigment (which inevidibly means they are assuming peoples color based on the part of the world they are from, which = guesswork).. And a cencus hasnt been carried out for looooong before feb 06..

What your saying has no real backing.. The other exists as part of the 92% white residents as a margin of error that you so convieniently fail to take into consideration..

Say what you like. But your not gonna win this argument.

__________________
RIP jono, peace out bboy.
Pardon Canada Criminal Record Pardons Services Toronto

You obviously don't know how a census works. They don't guess your race, you TELL them your race. The numbers aren't guesses, they're figures accumulated from accounted-for people.

But now you're telling me that the census is wrong, and you're right.

Once again, whered this "AND OTHER" come from that you said didn't exist. And where do black people factor into an equasion goes exactly liek this, if according to you...the census forgot to mention black people

92% white
+7% asian and/or middle eastern
+1% Aboriginal/"other"
--------------------
= 100%

If other isn't inclusive of black people, where does black people factor in on this? Under middle eastern/asian? Oh wait....yeah...you're right...under whites....

Oh no, you were saying there's a percentage missing and that percentage is the black statistic. What "magically missing" percentage is that on top of this 100%?

__________________