do ya'll believe in em? Me personally i could give a shit if two gay people want to get married, if they are americans then they should be allowed to wed. The whole "keeping marrieges pure" bullshit Bush is saying was out the window when it was legel to get married drop dead drunk in Vegas and it be legally upheld in court.

I'm a religious person, i believe in the bible but to be honest i'm not entirely bothered, they should be able to do what they like....as long as it's not directly affecting me...meh...

i dont care.....in canada they allow it and it dont faze me at all.......

that exactly what i think.

In the words of John Lennon...

"Let it be"

There's more important things to worry about.

__________________
Merkings will occur Monday thru Friday, 8 am thru 5 pm, C.S.T.
For my convenience, not yours!

ya as long as they don't fuck in front of me no problem

i think theres no problem with gay people getting maried

Let the friuts be happy with each other~Far away from me...

I think you missed the point there. It's not so much the idea of gays getting married, but changing the constitutional definition of marriege it'self, that worries me and those like bush. Never should the views of so little dictate and or manipulate the laws put into place by the majority. I think we should stick with the majority, and the majority in this country do not want the definiton of marriage to be changed by activist judges. I mean thnk about the repercussions this will have on our way of life and society. One who's to say that if a male or female couple is able to reep the benifits of a married couple(man and woman) then who to say that a man and his girl (not married) shouldn't? Not only does that open several gray area's as this. It also undermines the institution of mariage. Don't get me wrong, Im not against gay couples being able to share benifits and live together as a couple. I just do not see any reason what so ever to change the definiton of marriege from a man and a women, to that of any combination you can think of. Where is it going to stop, these grey areas, are going to become very troublesome. Who's to say (if the current definition is changed) that a man and a boy can't get married. The laws were drafted ariound the definiton of marriege in our constitution. They were purposely written in a way to protect society from these tyoes of abominations. Pediophiles would be next in line to alter the text, and what about paligamy? Shit would be crazy, people woulld no longer have any marital bounderies, people would be paried uo with sheep walking down the isle just to reep the benifits. Which in turn would devistate this countries economy and social morality. I for one stand behind the president on this isue, and if you do not see the logic there, then hit me up and we can disscuss this indepth. Why can't gay couples live together and our governemnt offer them protection and benifits wthout changing the defiinitons. That is what Bush was syaing, so I do not understand those that talk out thier ass about the situation. You need to look deeper into the issue. I am an active politician and this has ben a pressing issue with me. I hope you can understand my jibberish, I typed it fast and did not spell check.

__________________
FUCKA BABYLON BANDIT!!!

Bush said he is also thinking of changing the constitution so that gay marriages are illegel by the constitution which is sickening. The constitution gave people the right to vote,nowhere in it should it keep 2 people who love eachother away from getting wed.Its actually legel for 2nd cousins to get married in some parts of the country but its illegel for 2 people that love eachother too?

Point taken.
The constitution should not be modified by a issue that's in the media & under huge pressure.
That would make the law a mockery & like Bounce said would give the wrong ppl the chance the benefit from such adjustments.
Everything has loopholes..changin' the constitution..will increase these..which strikes back to whats been said earlier..benefits for the wrong people.
A gay marriage has nothing to do with unpurity or disgust..it's a opinion..which is completely legal..but a marriage isnt.
I am also sick & tired of these ppl basically living by the bible & quoting it..but as soon as it gets in their way..the bible is suddenly irrelevant.
I feel it should not be change, cause of the dangers it brings.
And dont take my last remark the wrong way..it's just a bunch of words symbolizing the fact that i am worried.

Gay Marriages Are Nasty...But I Don't Care..Let Them Do What They Want.

He did not, he impplied protecting the existing version of the constitution. I mean come on, don't let the liberal media lie to you. He never said a word of the sort.

^^ Again you are missing the context of my points. He is going to all he can to ensure protection and benifits of the married to those gay couples. He just does not for reason mentioned above want a few radical avtivist in judges cloaks, changing the constitution at their whim, or for special interest influence... I mean read deeper into the address, stop looking to the liberal media for all your information. Do you not understand the reason for opposition of this issue. they are by far more damaging to this country and our way of life, then any of the points you are trying to make here...

__________________
FUCKA BABYLON BANDIT!!!

I Think This Guy Has A Little Too Much To Say On This Subject If You Ask Me.....
I Think He Must Be Gay....
Why Else Would He Be So In Depth On The Subject?????

Get Help Brotha.....Serious....
And On The Subject.....I Don't Think They Should Be Able To Marry....
But I Live in Canada....So Its Legal Here....
But Meh.....
It Don't Really Bother Me Cuz I Sure As Fuck Ain't Gay....
And I Don't Really Give A Fuck About Gay People....