I was wondering which would have the better effect. This requires serious thinking. Alot of people would say too strict would be better, but I say otherwise. For example, my pop's cousin got strait A's his whole life and his parents were christian and very hard on him. He got accepted to an ivy league school. The day he got free he robbed a shoe store.(payless no lie, lmao) It made me think that maybe if you're deprived from the real world so long it'll be like pupils awakening to sunlight. Soon as you get a taste of freedom you will indeed, go crazy. So all this parental advisory restrictions can only do harm. I mean if you tell the child what he's seeing and the negative effects of it it'll be easier. I mean would parents rather let him find out from some friend? They're gonna have to find out sooner or later. Imagine if you just found out where baby's come from at the age of 18. I knew when I was like 4. Soon as I got old enough to make a baby I was already mature about it. I just think all sheilding their eyes and muffing their ears are just gonna make them go out of their way to get to whatever it is you don't want them to see and be more reckless about it. I just think they should stop all the bullshit and let people see and hear reality.

yea i agree wit u 100%
eventually kids r gonna hav to face reality for themselves, and the transition is easier if everythin isnt completely new to them

i agree as well to an extent.. i've been thinking about this for a while.. I got real sheltered family members.. and they're just wild as hell.. and my parents always were open with me.. told me exactly what i asked.. and after years of this.. i realize that living an open non-sheltered life.. is better in the long run.. but of course this varies depending on the adolescent..

__________________

My Lines Are ILL yo

Yeah I've seen a few people that stay away from all the bad shit and not get tempted. Although those are the same ones who are scared of everything. Fear is probably the worst feeling in the world.

word to that..cuz most of these people turn out to be curious cuz they were so limited to what they can do and not do

__________________

.The Realest Can Be.

.Dijital.

Yeah man..
I think certain things can be distressing to children if they are exposed at an early age. However most of the time, cencorship is taken WAY too far and only ends up making naieve people.

__________________
RIP jono, peace out bboy.
Pardon Canada Criminal Record Pardons Services Toronto

i agree to an extent but dumb asses well be like oh eminem killed his wife im going to do it too i mean like ppl dying trying to be like jack asses lol dumb ppl ruin it for everyone but i think it could be less strict

__________________

you bring up a good point, a person who is sheltered, is naive to not only actions available to them, but the consequences that follow. I don't think it's so much they go crazy, but there not very concious of being like everybody else, there naive to the idea that nobody is immune to the consequences for certain actions taken.

__________________

Time is not long, and indecision is hells cemment. So the well is rented, untill heaven is relevant. Untill then, to be eloquent, sex cells, so le'ts cellibate.

"watch what you watchin...fox keeps feedin' us toxin's..stop sleepin' start thinkin outside of the box and unplug from the matrix doctrine....but watch what you say cause big brother is watchin" - nas - sly fox

The I.H.C.J.S.F.M.T.R.H.P.M.M.W.T.S.M.S.I.T.F.F.W.A.S. O Crew

.
.
.
.
.
im just guessing that this kid never had to work a day in his life...and if so i agree....

__________________
I Beat Up Asshole Fathers For Free

My Space

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indeph Lyricalsolja you illy on the sickness tip.