Originally Posted by Nick Fletcher.
I guess this idea never took off.
A shame to because it would've been good. And now it is pointless to implement the idea because nobody battles anymore.
Right now theres really no point to battle, battling to just battle is cool except when the sites mad inactive and battles stay open weeks at a time, but if there was incentive, something as simple as a ranking system people would be more encouraged to participate as everyone would want to be at the top
Originally Posted by Cali
this would be damn near immpossible to judge.you would have old members like l.k and chirt who battled all legends and won alot then someone like memisis who ducked 100s of call outs,bashed herbs for years and battled someone good rarely.this would never work.the giants are ranked first but the titians havea better record.the celtics ran best but the lakers hae a better record.this wouldnt work.
I would rather try this and run into problems that we can correct and work on, then just not try and do nothing to improve the site
We would all have to start fresh, battle records can stay the same but they wouldn't count towards ratings, and the quality vs quantity thing would be partially handled by the rating of the battles, the better the battle the more 'points' or whatever go towards your rank, although a 5 point rating was suggested it should be 10 so the quality in the battles can be better judged and expressed in the rankings
If nothing else, a page where it collects and displays everyones records by category would be a start, or atleast something we can 'settle' for if not any of the suggested ideas prior