word......Kerry didnt save no one

when the swift boats was under fire he turned his round and ran

he came back later and shot a injured man


plus all his wounds are self inflicted

and thats a hero?!?!?!?!?


iknow bush skipped but at least hes strong and a good leader....he never collapsed under pressure but stood firm in grave danger


and to fuxjustaword: your a fuckin idiot

__________________

Fuck Kerry!!

so they found bushes records eh? ha bitch was flying planes livin the highlife while kerry was fight'n hows that for a leader?

question of the day who is the most powerful man in the u.s... if any of u genius's get this i will be very VERY surprised

i guess bush............. but my money is really on Cheney

no wait.............. Alan Greenspan

ding ding we have a winner, the man runs the nation , he is the single most powerful man in the nation, if you dont believe me ... well if this guy decides he is having a badday then the economy will go down. if he is having a good day the economy goes up. that my friends is power

Ultimately it doesnt matter, cuz the "ELECTORAL COLLEGE" DECIDES WHO THE PRESIDENT IS NOT "WE THE PEOPLE". But if I did vote, I'd go wit Bush for the following reasons:

1) Bush is ALL BALLS(ACTION) and NO BRAINS( HE LACKS THE ABILITY TO FORESEE THE CONSEQUENCES OF HIS ACTIONS). But at least he has a plan unlike Kerry. He's graspin at straws-and doesnt appear to have a substantive and or 'real' plan 4 our nations welfare, concerning things foreign (international) or domestic( within our nation.)

2) The 2nd reason is, "WHY START OVER"? I MEAN BUSH JUST GOT HIS LEGS UNDERNEATH HIM, SO WHY PUT 'NO-PLAN HAVIN KERRY' IN? SEE KERRY WILL HAVE TO DO THE SAME THING BUSH DID, ALL OVER AGAIN AND WHILE HE'S PLAYIN CATCHUP SEPT 12TH , 13TH, 14TH , ETC COULD HAPPEN.

NUFF SED

word we need a leader

__________________

eh thats the problem with bush , he is NO BRAINS, and if anyone starts spitt'n anything about yale i swear, but yea man is retarded, and thats what makes him so dangerous he dosent think of what his actions can lead to, which is important in this day and age , because you fuck up on that grand of a scale(he already has) then nothing good can come from it, i think it will be a slow start with kerry but you forget he does have war experience ... like he was a real soldier, not jus a rich boy doing jack shit, but he will be an advantage to himself, a new plan of attack would help raise moral , and give a lil bit to the economy, right now all bush has done is cause more problems, with our allies, and enemies(i dont care if he captured saddam , its osama and the rest of his friends i would like to see)


o yea we need a good leader , anyone but bush

Im votein and since bush been in office cant find a fuckin job and no overtime and he hasent even spoke at the naacp in the last 4 yrs
fuck em

my vote goes 2 kerry

__________________

fuxjus I feel what u sed, but try to see things practically. Your boy Kerry doesnt have a clue (a real plan). HELL if he did, I'd probably be inclined to vote 4 him, so long as-unlike Bush-he demonstrated to me that he has foresight in his decision making( which currently he does not, that's why he constantly contradicts himself.)

Oh P.S. That stat on Civil War dead was probably inaccurate if u did'nt first subtract the CONFEDERATE DEAD, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT AMERICANS. FUKKN TREASONOUS 'SESH' BASTARDS. aiight, anyway 1

Im feelin wat raptor is sayin......... hes esplainin himself alot better then sumother people up on this site........... and i admit that my faith in Kerry has been droppin cuz he seems to have no plan to wat to do with the Iraq War. Bush hasnt talked about it that much either lately, but we all know where he stands...... a couple points tho

1. how many times am i gonna have to say the reason kerry voted not to give MORE money for the troops and shit is because it had been along time and they found no weapons (or sadaam at that point) so he wanted them out of there.

2. yea i put confederates in....... but it still prolly be more with just union

3. ohhh one little fact. Even tho North Korea has nukes and Iraq supposedly had weapons of mass destruction, neither of them could travel all the way from even the edge of Europe to the Coast of the US......... and second off. we have huge military intelligence technology today that could detect these missiles from far away and could blow them to pieces with no harm done to the Us if the missiles magically could reach.......... i think there was even a report that North Koreas missiles could only land in countries in some countries in Europe at the most.

4. other point was too long, so i forgot this one.

bush is dumb , we should have gone into north korea or something ... at least wait for some UN backing on the situation, were going to be paying for this one for a while

^You talk too damn much...

__________________