Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fgee
the fact is..
saddam has no WoMD as the media love to call it
bushs so called 'intelligence' in fact turned out to be fucking idiots cos the evidence for any weapons was non existent and went on assumptions
|
OK I take personnel offense at this comment. Not only are you way off base here, you just called me an idiot. Yes, I am part of the "Idiot Intellegence" as you have called it. What do you know about the community that gives you reason to lable it "idoits"? Are you doing anything to contribute to it? Have you risked life and limb, just to help paint a better picture? I mean tell me why you call it Bush's intellegence, when it was the very same intel community and intel it's self, that approached Clinton. Yet no one on the left wants to talk about that. Evidence non existant, wrong again, only the weapons have been non existant, so far. It's been proven the weapons were in existance, it's been proven the program was in existance. What's really important here is the proff that they WERE destroyed, is non existant! Saddam was obligated via cease fire regulations and Un resolutions, to offer up prof of these KNOWN weapons being destroyed. Was there any documented prof? I think not! That my friend is grounds to reengage in war with his regime. The UN and international law experts everywhere understand this to be true, why do you think no letigation has been brought up against the US. It's actions were complelty legal and warrented. I agree with most of you, War is a horrible thing. Human evil has been the worlds problem from day one, and it still is today, bringing down Saddam lessoned that factor of evil in the world. If the liberation of good people from an evil dictator is not a responsibilty of the United states, then it must be looked at as a duty.
Bottom line is: World with Saddam= Evil
World without Saddam = less evil.
Makes sense to me...