I'm seeing the argument as a white vs colored argument? THE ENTIRE THREAD is about that. The topic is wether we're really the same or not. Saying white people are superior because they've accomplished so much more than other races. I didn't play that card, the original poster did. It's not a culture vs culture argument because the OP is asking if we're all, as in the races, are the same. Not the cultures.

And what you're doing is exactly what I was talking about. You're acting as if I'm the the first person in this thread to bring this up, I said what I said, because that's what happened, period. And the history of it is recorded in such a positive light because caucasions WROTE the history. History is written by the winners, and caucasions have definetly won in the periods we're talking about. We say christopher columbus DISCOVERED america, as if America only began to exact when white people arrived. We act as if Africa has never advanced as a civilization, just because it's current state is completley fucked up. All you see from Africa on TV now is poor bullshit and war. What I'm saying is how it got that way.

It seems like I'm attacking because it's negative. If what I'm saying is attacking, then you saying blacks sold blacks is attacking black people. I swear to God I don't have a single problem with white people, and if it sounds like I'm angry it's because I am. I'm mad because I DONT LIKE having to talk to people like this all the time. But it seems like fuckin 90% of the internet is full of people who have absolutely no knowledge of what they're saying, but already feel so passionately about it. You don't have to try to understand, but don't try to twist shit like I hate white people or some shit when you didn't accuse any of these white people of hating black people for what they said.