I thought that imagery and story was a huge part...apparently not..so enlighten me...

__________________

I Speak Out
Battles
Pink Slips 007 Pt. 2

originality in my book kills anything..but definitly the depth as well..imagery is always good so the reader can depict the story better...and story goes along the lines of originality...some people aren't original no matter how hard they try...takes an autistic mind to really capture insanity in a piece...

-1-

__________________
SOFT FOCUS crew record (3-0) Wits end ~ DOI ~ Central....now who's next?
sacred scriptures record (5-0)

that explains my understanding a bit better...but there have got to be other elements according to the things I have seen gone down...

__________________

I Speak Out
Battles
Pink Slips 007 Pt. 2

I say, that imagery and originality are important, but without the delivery and the right expansion of words, it wont be good.

So what about those cats who rely on a dictionary/thesauras to get there words..than it's not original than they do something to try to make themselves feel good..

__________________

I Speak Out
Battles
Pink Slips 007 Pt. 2

dont use a thesausas, a gud way to expand is use slang sometimes. or subsitute words for words, making it seem like your telling the story from your view.

Exactly..people don't fuckin do that do..they use cheater methodz..

__________________

I Speak Out
Battles
Pink Slips 007 Pt. 2

Yep, fronting like there j.k rowling.

with my topicals i go for imagry, content, and wordplay
i ususally try and tell a story with mine...

White Lite...u wont elevate u suk so dont worry about it

imagery...originality....flips in the story...and word play all crucial parts to a topical ...in some pieces maybe not word play so much but it all helps to make a dope piece

~posted by deacon..couldnt have said it better~

"originality" in my book kills anything..but definitly the depth as well..imagery is always good so the reader can depict the story better...and story goes along the lines of originality...some people aren't original no matter how hard they try...takes an artistic mind to really capture insanity in a piece...

-1-

well deacon I had thought so as well....ridiculous fucks

<---got a 29 on his ACT's....uses the big words and doesn't have to look them up! Only when I'm arguing/debating though. Who the fuck wants to talk like that all the time?

Sorry, forgot to reply to the topic. Imagery...orginality....a fresh concept on the topic. One that isn't predictable. Something no one else could think of.

It needs to flow, have internals and multi's, portray the topic using imagery and emotion, have a good writers voice and word choice placed behind it.