and an even worse lawyer...


You present so-called "evidence" as truth...and, because you find other "evidence" to corroborate the first "evidence", you accept it as GOSPEL truth.

The fact is, you can make anything agree to perpetuate a point of view or belief. Then, when I don't fall head over heels over your "evidence", you claim it's a defense mechanism. eh ehh... If someone runs in a room and yells, "OMG, there's a fire," my initial reaction is shock. They just created something sensational. If you come in and say, "OMG, AIDS INVENTOR JUST ADMITTED IT," then my reaction will be the same of, "WHAT!"...

WHat do you think sensationalism is? You're a conspiracy theorist. A patent on a virus?

That's laughable. Why is that laughable? It's laughable because if it's a Government secret project, there would be no records of a patent.



THink about it. Even these so-called Documents could be fabricated. information from google?


Be for real. If you can prove this is true, I'll stand corrected. But, showing me documents downloaded from the Internet is NOT irrefutable evidence than any of this is anything more than a hoax.

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"