SIMPLE

There IS GRAVITY on the moon...just less than on Earth...EVERYTHING in space has gravity in the form of graviatation--i.e., the pull of everything in space on each other.

And, the answer to your second question is simple.

The FLag WaVED like that because there IS NO AIR...get it? It's called Inertia
**there is no wind resistance to STOP the flag FROM waving.
All they would have to do is Get the flag Moving manually and it would continue to move because OF the Lack of strong gravitational pull and lack of air.

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

i felt smart for a minute then

__________________

Evo's Myspace

E.C- Untitled

Because it takes 6 months to get to Mars, NASA has a hard enough time just with the 9 minute flight into space.. I would say by the time were like 80 they will just be sending humans there..

__________________
fuck you

[

watch and wait...they're gonna return to the moon...and in less than 100 years, they'll begin building hotels and travel destinations on the moon

I say by the year 2106



and B-Mac...thats my point...it's challenging to get to MArs...but THAT could be the focus of the NASA program and the nation

imagine when we land on mars for the 1st time...that'll be awesome


I personally think Nasa is going in the wrong direction...have u seen the prototype for the "next" gen. shuttle...DEF. a step backwards

dunno WTF they're doing

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

WHAT?!?!!? man thats impossible. Inertia alone would jsut have one wave, not numerous ones. Nothing on a planet is perpetual thanks to gravity.

And how do you contest the numerous conflicting light sources in the photos, misplaced cross-hairs, and lack of indentation where the LEM supposedly landed??

__________________

How they gonna do that? There's millions of trillions of meteors that storm the earth every second, you dont' think they'll catch a few hundred million of em?

__________________

if u look at a wave flap, there is DEF. contact between the flag and the pole...that contact could create jus the right amt. of force through inertia to keep a flag "waving"...and since gravity is less of a factor, it would be possible. On earth, wind creates that effect. Though, there is no wind on the Moon. Why else wouldn't a flag keep moving on earth if you wave it? It's because gravity would pull downward on it and eventually stop it.


and as far as light goes, u have to realize that the space craft itself probably had light sources on it...Just because an article written by a conspiracy theorist said it didn't doesn't make it true.


Fact is, going to the moon is quite feasible and I believe more evidence exists to suggest they did it than not.

Oh...and for the people who argue that we didn't land on the moon because of the lack of a dust plume...Well...here's that Explanation.


ON earth, dust plums created by thrusters kick up dust because of the Air between the rocket and the ground...In other words, as the fuel jettisons from the rocket, it pushes downward on the air in between the thruster and the ground. On the moon, there is no AIR. So, as the gas jettisons out the thruster, it DOES NOT create a dust plume.



WE went to the moon.


1

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

millions of meterites hit earth every day as well.



always have...and we're still here


won't be forever...but that's life.

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

you should work for nasa q

__________________

Evo's Myspace

E.C- Untitled

no interest...

BUT...space travel interests me...esp. theories concerning space and time travel


thats a whole notha can of worms though

fascinating stuff

__________________

Youtube Video for my song "CARRY ON"

nah, no way. There is no way that a piece of cloth is going to absorb that much shock to perpetuate vibration and manifest as waves. Thats' simply unlealistic. The flag is no where near A: that rigid or b: going to multiply energy.

Youd have a valid argument about th light if the ship actually had lights on it. In not a single one of the pics can you see any light at all on the ship.

No one's mentioning dust plumes. I'm talking about a crator from where the ship's thrusters would have displaced material before it landed. And yes there would be a dust plume since it's GRAVITY that makes particles leave and treturn to the surface, not wind. That'd jsut make them move once they were airborne, not prevent them from becoming airborne.

__________________

That's all well and good but that dosent' adress how you foresee that any craft would not be decimated by the sheer amount of meteroites coming toward the earth as a craft is tring to exit it.

__________________