RapVerse.com Community
 Phenom | Kingz | Dabatos | TonySelf | Tha Q | Half Breed | Tito | 7th End RV Radio  

Go Back   RapVerse.com Community > The block > Lyricist Lounge
User Name
Password
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-04-06, 03:32 AM   #31
TeamOne
FuxJustAWord
 
Posts: 7,092
Joined: Aug 2004
From: Chitown
Status: Offline
IP: D6DE 8AA8

and it would Def. NOT take weeks for another country to make a move, lmao...... its not like its gonna take a week to send a plane off to drop a bomb, or to send one off by a button......

and btw, the US army is not as strong as u think it is..... even if there were no nukes there would be no way we could take over the whole world.... shit, even the israeli army would give us trouble
__________________

...The real Renegade before Hova...
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 03:35 AM   #32
TeamOne
FuxJustAWord
 
Posts: 7,092
Joined: Aug 2004
From: Chitown
Status: Offline
IP: D6DE 8AA8

GOD, why wont someone like APexx or another person on this site who knows wat they are talkin about PLEASE come in here to tell Serbness he is wrong..... maybe if another person says it he might stop arguin
__________________

...The real Renegade before Hova...
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 03:37 AM   #33
Terumoto
I have a lot to learn...
 
Terumoto's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,740
Joined: Mar 2004
From: Life.
Status: Offline
Text Record: 44-10
IP: 0B90 96F9

Legit? No.

With surprise nuclear attacks that destroy the political centres of every country? Probably.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 03:40 AM   #34
Feeble Minded
Light Weight
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Jun 2006
Status: Offline
Text Record: 0-0
Audio Record: 0-0
Graphics Record: 0-0
IP: 3240 794D

Let me start off by summing up the average intelligence level in this thread: LMAO

1. you can't nuke a country when they "aren't ready." Every major power in the world has radar and other military systems that will pick up a nuclear missile. If the US sends a nuke at China right now, China would send one back long before ours hit them. People in this thread claiming you could "surprise attack" other countries with nuclear weapons is laughable.

2. The world is a lot different today than it was pre-WWII. As far as warfare, this is due to advancements such as but not limited to Nuclear Weapons. A safer system of treaties has been established due to the failures that led up to WWI and WWII. Also, the US is no longer the world's undisputed superpower. Other countries are capable of facing the US in "non-nuclear" warfare. But lets not kid ourselves, any wars between major powers today have a high likelihood of becoming nuclear. And the U.S. is far from the only country with nuclear weapons.

3. To the dude speculating the strength of the U.S. army: The US army is much stronger than you are making it out to be. However, it is not strong enough to take over some countries, because taking over a country is not as simple as who has better weapons. There are many factors: how will troops arrive in that country? what factor will the air force play? who controls the water? Even more important than those things to a country's military stength are its economic abilities - can we manufacture the goods needed for warfare efficiently? can we outproduce the opposing power? There are a lot more factors than I just mentioned, but the U.S. is militarily strong when we aren't spread out. That doesn't mean we could conquer a country like China though. Nor could they conquer us.

Last edited by Feeble Minded : 07-04-06 at 03:50 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 03:53 AM   #35
Feeble Minded
Light Weight
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Jun 2006
Status: Offline
Text Record: 0-0
Audio Record: 0-0
Graphics Record: 0-0
IP: 3240 794D

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigChase
LMAO
wow...
First of All Korea doesnt even have nukes..theyre still testing...
and our technology>theirs

the only reason were scared of north Korea is bcause if they acually had a nuke...they would be crazy enough to threaten South Korea with it...

Don't speculate on that. There's no way of knowing whether or not they have nuclear weapons, and honestly, its more likely that they do than anything.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 04:28 AM   #36
Chris Stylez
Semper Fi
 
Chris Stylez's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,269
Joined: Jan 2005
From: Uptown Maryland
Status: Offline
IP: 3240 794D

Give me America's forces and i could take over the world.... But naw really America has about a 5% chance of taking over the entire world IMO. But that is a lot greater than any other country taking over the entire world. For one thing with the way the U.S. public is with war i dont even think that our population will be with it to even draw up plans to even take over the world. As soon as the US would even try to take it over the world. America will probely tear itself down before the other countries will have a chance to send their nukes. So basicly I think America couldnt really take over the world. Our country will most likely takes its self down and have its own problems much less having to deal with all the other countries that exist.

And I thought the U.S. did have 70,000 nukes just not armed. I thought only like 7,000 of our nukes were on standby and the rest of them had to have there cores inserted in or something like that.
__________________

Project List

The Classick Mixtape Vol (8/18)
Age Of Consent Mixtape Vol 1(16/16)
The Classick Album(2/16)
S&S Express E.P.(1/10)

Lot of back to back shit. Stay tuned.
Send a message via AIM to Chris Stylez Send a message via Yahoo to Chris Stylez   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 10:39 AM   #37
Sean Gunner
GG Haterz
 
Sean Gunner's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,387
Joined: Jul 2004
Status: Offline
IP: C2BF CF62

They already did if you think about it.

People rush here to live and become citizens of the country. So now we have minions, all the countries around the world wanted to be just like us, and we controlled them with our power and technology, and then they all start to fight back and advance themselves. Now, we have a rebellion against the US dynasty and thousands of countries becoming stronger everyday to the point where the US is scared to make a move against any of them.

Is the US gonna rule the world? Not anymore.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisted Visions
50 nickle=less than 50 cent, go back to school you idiot
Seangunner@gmail.com
For Anyone Who Wants to Talk to Me

^^I think this explains my view on gangster rap perfectly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 11:24 AM   #38
SerB
....S.....
 
SerB's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,435
Joined: Jan 2006
Status: Offline
IP: 329A 17E6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feeble Minded
Let me start off by summing up the average intelligence level in this thread: LMAO

1. you can't nuke a country when they "aren't ready." Every major power in the world has radar and other military systems that will pick up a nuclear missile. If the US sends a nuke at China right now, China would send one back long before ours hit them. People in this thread claiming you could "surprise attack" other countries with nuclear weapons is laughable.

2. The world is a lot different today than it was pre-WWII. As far as warfare, this is due to advancements such as but not limited to Nuclear Weapons. A safer system of treaties has been established due to the failures that led up to WWI and WWII. Also, the US is no longer the world's undisputed superpower. Other countries are capable of facing the US in "non-nuclear" warfare. But lets not kid ourselves, any wars between major powers today have a high likelihood of becoming nuclear. And the U.S. is far from the only country with nuclear weapons.

3. To the dude speculating the strength of the U.S. army: The US army is much stronger than you are making it out to be. However, it is not strong enough to take over some countries, because taking over a country is not as simple as who has better weapons. There are many factors: how will troops arrive in that country? what factor will the air force play? who controls the water? Even more important than those things to a country's military stength are its economic abilities - can we manufacture the goods needed for warfare efficiently? can we outproduce the opposing power? There are a lot more factors than I just mentioned, but the U.S. is militarily strong when we aren't spread out. That doesn't mean we could conquer a country like China though. Nor could they conquer us.


This is what I pretty much said about the radar.

But I came to realize that Radar can be worked with over time. Like stealth jet planes and crap like that.
__________________
em ur mother is a crack whore kims a known slut so whats halie goin to be when she grews up?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 11:37 AM   #39
SerB
....S.....
 
SerB's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,435
Joined: Jan 2006
Status: Offline
IP: 329A 17E6

see. i just read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-bomb


america doesn't have 10,000 bombs. they have the power to make that many. but they haven't made that many yet.

wow at russia, dam they could of fucked ppl so hard back then.




^ that is sick looking. i wouldn't even touch that,.
__________________
em ur mother is a crack whore kims a known slut so whats halie goin to be when she grews up?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 03:58 PM   #40
Crazy Hades
Just searching.
 
Posts: 6,015
Joined: Nov 2004
Status: Offline
IP: AA03 BBBD

You are...completely idiotic.

The wikipedia article says: U.S. and USSR/Russian nuclear weapons stockpiles, 1945-2005.

Not

'potential to make nuclear weapons'.

There are different yields of nuclear warheads. There are tactical and hundred megatons...nukes designed to destroy underground bunkers...multiple nuclear missiles within nuclear missiles...

They couldn't have done much because both sides didn't really know how many the other had. It was just a stalemate. Ever heard of the Cold War?

And how is TeamOne going to say 'we'd even have trouble with the Israeli army'? Almost every country would. Their airforce is unbelievably powerful; they shot down and won like ten times the number of airplanes than the Arabs did in a war. It was like

625 downed Arabs
62 Israelites

Probably less Israelites. No one wants to fuck with that country. They themselves have a noteworthy nuclear power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 04:08 PM   #41
.Ike.
Ike
 
Posts: 4,949
Joined: Jan 2005
Status: Offline
Audio Record: 3-1
IP: F5EA AA2D

yes they could...

if they took the right approach....

itd have to be very well thought out....but yea...it could happen if they wanted it to
Send a message via AIM to .Ike.   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 04:18 PM   #42
Crazy Hades
Just searching.
 
Posts: 6,015
Joined: Nov 2004
Status: Offline
IP: AA03 BBBD

Uh yeah, so many people have tried to take over the world, and no one has succeeded, it seems. Alexander the Great didn't, neither did Napoleon. It's the same case, even if we do have nukes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 05:57 PM   #43
Chris Stylez
Semper Fi
 
Chris Stylez's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,269
Joined: Jan 2005
From: Uptown Maryland
Status: Offline
IP: 0825 899A

Well we dont have to take over the world throught purely world terms...We could possibely take it over with buisnesses, trade, and purely economics.There is a hell of a lot of countries with economic problems....if we play our cards right we can possibely set up buisneses and take over there nations with economics and buisnesses. You gotta take over countries with buisnesses first. Build up or international army and if u want u can continue to take it over with buisnesses or military force.
__________________

Project List

The Classick Mixtape Vol (8/18)
Age Of Consent Mixtape Vol 1(16/16)
The Classick Album(2/16)
S&S Express E.P.(1/10)

Lot of back to back shit. Stay tuned.
Send a message via AIM to Chris Stylez Send a message via Yahoo to Chris Stylez   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 06:12 PM   #44
SerB
....S.....
 
SerB's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,435
Joined: Jan 2006
Status: Offline
IP: 329A 17E6

Like the nazi. alot of countries would be evaded by usa and they'd join the USA side making them stronger.

hands down tho, america if they wanted to can fuck any country so fast. but thats not the point of war.
__________________
em ur mother is a crack whore kims a known slut so whats halie goin to be when she grews up?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-06, 06:29 PM   #45
TeamOne
FuxJustAWord
 
Posts: 7,092
Joined: Aug 2004
From: Chitown
Status: Offline
IP: D6DE 8AA8

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Hades
You are...completely idiotic.

The wikipedia article says: U.S. and USSR/Russian nuclear weapons stockpiles, 1945-2005.

Not

'potential to make nuclear weapons'.

There are different yields of nuclear warheads. There are tactical and hundred megatons...nukes designed to destroy underground bunkers...multiple nuclear missiles within nuclear missiles...

They couldn't have done much because both sides didn't really know how many the other had. It was just a stalemate. Ever heard of the Cold War?

And how is TeamOne going to say 'we'd even have trouble with the Israeli army'? Almost every country would. Their airforce is unbelievably powerful; they shot down and won like ten times the number of airplanes than the Arabs did in a war. It was like

625 downed Arabs
62 Israelites

Probably less Israelites. No one wants to fuck with that country. They themselves have a noteworthy nuclear power.


u, my friend, are extremely smart, i must say..... plus, i did not say that Israeli's army was NOT strong, and thus proving America had a weak army..... i was simply stating that it is CRAZY to think we could take over the world wen it would take ALOT of our power to just take out one of the smaller countries in the world......

And btw Serb........ that link u posted in this thread also states maybe 4 things in this thread that u stated i was wrong on..... includin the statement about nuclear weapons with different yields of power, etc..... so thank u for proving me even more right.......

And i never said the US army was not extremely strong....... i was just stating that we werent the unstoppable force that alot of u were making us out to be....... like Feeble stated, we wouldnt be a good army if we were spread out (no army would) but the point is is that we HAVE to be spread out in order to take over the world.... there is no way around it..... we're going to have to occupy these countries and stop rebellions, etc...... there is NO chance in hell we could literally take over the world.... now, if we all of a sudden discovered that some part of our country resides over the largest oil supply in the world.... well than America would always be the biggest superpower, no doubt
__________________

...The real Renegade before Hova...
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin.
Copyright © 2000-2004 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.