![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Phenom | Kingz | Dabatos | TonySelf | Tha Q | Half Breed | Tito | 7th End | RV Radio ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
FuxJustAWord
|
IP:
*clears throat*
there are, i believe nuclear fission nukes and nuclear fusion nukes..... (although i cant remember which one hydrogen bombs fall under and which group A-Bombs fall under.... but i do know they are not in the same group and that Hydrogen bombs are alot more powerful) now, they have made 70,000........ this is fact, look it up urself.... but u are right, we dont actually HAVE 70000 at the present moment..... but its more like 10,000... and some have different strength of yield... this is also true, look it up.... i dont believe i said there werer different sizes, but there ARE ones that are more powerful than others.... also, dont be so positive that america would shoot down all the nukes, and if they did... as i sed before, the aftermath of the blast in the air which would fall onto America anyways, would most likely still cause the widespread cancer and deformation of people, etc etc like in Japan.... and we let 2 planes hit the world trade centers and another hit the pentagon.... u dont think that a country could land a nuke in America? yes, i admit our counter is good, but to think that we would just deflect every bomb away like nothin is crazy.... |
||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
FuxJustAWord
|
IP:
why did u say "walk with nukes?"
and LMAO at u makin it seem like Allies are some primitive "school fight" thing.... i wont even deal with that... the two biggest wars this world has seen is in LARGE part because of alliances....... why do u think America DOESNT try to take over the world????? because its not like we would be able to do it ONE country at a time.. EVERY country has alliances, and it is for the purpose of both a defense (meaning that a country will not even start a war with them because they know if they do they will also have to be fighting another country or other countries) and also as a form of military help (so if the country is crazy enought or willing to take that risk, u will have another country to help u out) .... not to mention the benefits of trade and such with ur allies |
||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
FuxJustAWord
|
IP:
and it would Def. NOT take weeks for another country to make a move, lmao...... its not like its gonna take a week to send a plane off to drop a bomb, or to send one off by a button......
and btw, the US army is not as strong as u think it is..... even if there were no nukes there would be no way we could take over the whole world.... shit, even the israeli army would give us trouble |
||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
FuxJustAWord
|
IP:
GOD, why wont someone like APexx or another person on this site who knows wat they are talkin about PLEASE come in here to tell Serbness he is wrong..... maybe if another person says it he might stop arguin
|
||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
I have a lot to learn...
|
IP:
Legit? No.
With surprise nuclear attacks that destroy the political centres of every country? Probably.
__________________
|
||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Light Weight
|
IP:
Let me start off by summing up the average intelligence level in this thread: LMAO
1. you can't nuke a country when they "aren't ready." Every major power in the world has radar and other military systems that will pick up a nuclear missile. If the US sends a nuke at China right now, China would send one back long before ours hit them. People in this thread claiming you could "surprise attack" other countries with nuclear weapons is laughable. 2. The world is a lot different today than it was pre-WWII. As far as warfare, this is due to advancements such as but not limited to Nuclear Weapons. A safer system of treaties has been established due to the failures that led up to WWI and WWII. Also, the US is no longer the world's undisputed superpower. Other countries are capable of facing the US in "non-nuclear" warfare. But lets not kid ourselves, any wars between major powers today have a high likelihood of becoming nuclear. And the U.S. is far from the only country with nuclear weapons. 3. To the dude speculating the strength of the U.S. army: The US army is much stronger than you are making it out to be. However, it is not strong enough to take over some countries, because taking over a country is not as simple as who has better weapons. There are many factors: how will troops arrive in that country? what factor will the air force play? who controls the water? Even more important than those things to a country's military stength are its economic abilities - can we manufacture the goods needed for warfare efficiently? can we outproduce the opposing power? There are a lot more factors than I just mentioned, but the U.S. is militarily strong when we aren't spread out. That doesn't mean we could conquer a country like China though. Nor could they conquer us. Last edited by Feeble Minded : 07-04-06 at 03:50 AM. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
....S.....
|
IP:
Quote:
This is what I pretty much said about the radar. But I came to realize that Radar can be worked with over time. Like stealth jet planes and crap like that.
__________________
em ur mother is a crack whore kims a known slut so whats halie goin to be when she grews up? |
||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Semper Fi
|
IP:
Give me America's forces and i could take over the world.... But naw really America has about a 5% chance of taking over the entire world IMO. But that is a lot greater than any other country taking over the entire world. For one thing with the way the U.S. public is with war i dont even think that our population will be with it to even draw up plans to even take over the world. As soon as the US would even try to take it over the world. America will probely tear itself down before the other countries will have a chance to send their nukes. So basicly I think America couldnt really take over the world. Our country will most likely takes its self down and have its own problems much less having to deal with all the other countries that exist.
And I thought the U.S. did have 70,000 nukes just not armed. I thought only like 7,000 of our nukes were on standby and the rest of them had to have there cores inserted in or something like that.
__________________
![]() Project List The Classick Mixtape Vol (8/18) Age Of Consent Mixtape Vol 1(16/16) The Classick Album(2/16) S&S Express E.P.(1/10) Lot of back to back shit. Stay tuned. |
||
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
GG Haterz
|
IP:
They already did if you think about it.
People rush here to live and become citizens of the country. So now we have minions, all the countries around the world wanted to be just like us, and we controlled them with our power and technology, and then they all start to fight back and advance themselves. Now, we have a rebellion against the US dynasty and thousands of countries becoming stronger everyday to the point where the US is scared to make a move against any of them. Is the US gonna rule the world? Not anymore.
__________________
![]() Quote:
For Anyone Who Wants to Talk to Me ![]() ^^I think this explains my view on gangster rap perfectly. |
||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
....S.....
|
IP:
see. i just read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-bomb
america doesn't have 10,000 bombs. they have the power to make that many. but they haven't made that many yet. wow at russia, dam they could of fucked ppl so hard back then. ![]() ^ that is sick looking. i wouldn't even touch that,.
__________________
em ur mother is a crack whore kims a known slut so whats halie goin to be when she grews up? |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Just searching.
|
IP:
You are...completely idiotic.
The wikipedia article says: U.S. and USSR/Russian nuclear weapons stockpiles, 1945-2005. Not 'potential to make nuclear weapons'. There are different yields of nuclear warheads. There are tactical and hundred megatons...nukes designed to destroy underground bunkers...multiple nuclear missiles within nuclear missiles... They couldn't have done much because both sides didn't really know how many the other had. It was just a stalemate. Ever heard of the Cold War? And how is TeamOne going to say 'we'd even have trouble with the Israeli army'? Almost every country would. Their airforce is unbelievably powerful; they shot down and won like ten times the number of airplanes than the Arabs did in a war. It was like 625 downed Arabs 62 Israelites Probably less Israelites. No one wants to fuck with that country. They themselves have a noteworthy nuclear power. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
FuxJustAWord
|
IP:
Quote:
u, my friend, are extremely smart, i must say..... plus, i did not say that Israeli's army was NOT strong, and thus proving America had a weak army..... i was simply stating that it is CRAZY to think we could take over the world wen it would take ALOT of our power to just take out one of the smaller countries in the world...... And btw Serb........ that link u posted in this thread also states maybe 4 things in this thread that u stated i was wrong on..... includin the statement about nuclear weapons with different yields of power, etc..... so thank u for proving me even more right....... And i never said the US army was not extremely strong....... i was just stating that we werent the unstoppable force that alot of u were making us out to be....... like Feeble stated, we wouldnt be a good army if we were spread out (no army would) but the point is is that we HAVE to be spread out in order to take over the world.... there is no way around it..... we're going to have to occupy these countries and stop rebellions, etc...... there is NO chance in hell we could literally take over the world.... now, if we all of a sudden discovered that some part of our country resides over the largest oil supply in the world.... well than America would always be the biggest superpower, no doubt |
|||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Ike
|
IP:
yes they could...
if they took the right approach.... itd have to be very well thought out....but yea...it could happen if they wanted it to
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Just searching.
|
IP:
Uh yeah, so many people have tried to take over the world, and no one has succeeded, it seems. Alexander the Great didn't, neither did Napoleon. It's the same case, even if we do have nukes.
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Semper Fi
|
IP:
Well we dont have to take over the world throught purely world terms...We could possibely take it over with buisnesses, trade, and purely economics.There is a hell of a lot of countries with economic problems....if we play our cards right we can possibely set up buisneses and take over there nations with economics and buisnesses. You gotta take over countries with buisnesses first. Build up or international army and if u want u can continue to take it over with buisnesses or military force.
__________________
![]() Project List The Classick Mixtape Vol (8/18) Age Of Consent Mixtape Vol 1(16/16) The Classick Album(2/16) S&S Express E.P.(1/10) Lot of back to back shit. Stay tuned. |
||
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|