you have to excuse Mad Dog.
He's an idiot

anyway, I still lean more towards that AIDS is man made.
Whether it was purposely or accidental

__________________

Ofcourse its not man-made, its from Q's ancestors, and as we all know, Q isnt human.

Sorry, had to

__________________

AIDS is a virus, and therefore is not living... and therefore can not change to try to "survive".... because it can neither live nor die

the one thats in existance now is the same one that was originally "created" or somehow came into being according to you

__________________

AIDS is not man made. Seriously.

Only a fucking idiot would claim that the government would start a virus like as a form of "population control." But, everything has to be a government conspiracy, so there you go.

(what i just said above was in response to the discussion on the first page)

__________________

I didnt say it was for population control
but you cant say the government isnt suspicious
and not neccessarily the US government

__________________

Why is it so far fetched?...the gov might not have made it, and they might have...but to completely disreguard the fact that they might have is ignorant, you never know if they did or not, its the perfect plan when you think about it, the population is rising like crazy, besides war, what else can they do to control it, napolean did it through wars and nobody knew that was his intention until later in time, it could go either way, but you cant say someone is idiotic for believing that, its a matter of opinion.

__________________

I didn't say that the idea is far fetched, but it seems to me that EVERYTHING negative somehow has a conspiracy tied to the government and it's fucking annoying. Is it so hard to believe that the government doesn't want to kill off hundreds of millions of people all over the world?

no...virus's are living, like I said, otherwise they wouldnt do anything, dead things dont move, but virus's move.

__________________

lmao, are you serious?
that concept of living things is so elementary

and wow, ur post that i quoted about that dissapeared


but anyways, viruses cannot reproduce without a host cell, and are therefore not living organisms....

vi·rus
n. pl. vi·rus·es

Any of various simple submicroscopic parasites of plants, animals, and bacteria that often cause disease and that consist essentially of a core of RNA or DNA surrounded by a protein coat. Unable to replicate without a host cell, viruses are typically not considered living organisms.
A disease caused by a virus.
Something that poisons one's soul or mind: the pernicious virus of racism.


want another source? look anywhere dawg....
viruses are NOT living, ur wrong

__________________

you are a dumb ass mother fucker... did you ever take BIOLOGY??
there are 5 things that define a living organism...

1) it must be made up of one or more cells... VIRUSES ARENT MADE UP OF CELLS... LIKE I SAID B4, THEY ARE DNA IN A PROTEIN COAT...

2) They must be able to reproduce... VIRUSES DONT REPRODUCE, THEY LOCK ON TO A HOST AND CORRUPT THE CELL'S DNA, IN TURN CORRUPTING OTHER CELL'S DNA AND CAUSING DAMAGE

3) They must maintain homeostasis... THIS MEANS THEY MUST MAKE CHANGES TO THEMSELVES IN ORDER TO SURVIVE... THEY DONT.. PERIOD

I cant remember the other two right off hand but living organisms must follow ALL FIVE.... and if it fails the first THREE, then it cannot possible pass ALL FIVE.....
and dumbass... DO PLANTS MOVE? i didnt think so, but they ARE living...

No no no, not for population control, people keep sayin that
I was thinkin more of biological warfare.
it was maybe created to slow down ecomony.
Maybe AIDS is just a prototype and they are developing somethin stronger than AIDS that kills you quicker think about it.

Country A is at war with country b
country A capture a few prisoners, and let them go back to their country
BLAOW
It starts to spread like crazy.
Sex is a very deadly weapon, cos just about everybody do it

__________________

That would be dumb to do. Cuz once there's always a chance that it'll come back to country A.

__________________
Mic Master Hung

thats why it hasnt been done yet

__________________

Question: Are viruses living?
Kim Michalek

Answer: There is a tremendous debate about this question - scientists do not agree
on the answer. Some people consider them to be just a bunch of chemicals. Other
people consider them to be living parasites, because they require the metabolic
machinery of host cells to survive. But they do reproduce, and they do have genetic
material, so many people consider them to be the simplest living organisms. Probably
the safest answer is that viruses have both living and nonliving characteristics.
Source: BIOLOGY, by Neil Campbell, third edition
Ellen Mayo

__________________